Timeline for Detecting Motion behind a robot
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2016 at 6:31 | vote | accept | HDatta | ||
| Jan 25, 2016 at 22:57 | comment | added | Majenko | Was the answer helpful? If so, please accept it by clicking on the "tick" icon next to the answer, and also possibly upvote it. This indicates to other users that you found the answer useful, and it also stops Stack Exchange from periodically "bumping" your question in the hope of getting an accepted answer. Thanks for your understanding and cooperation! | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 19:58 | comment | added | Gerben | Couldn't you point the PIRs slightly to the back. So you essentially split the 360degrees into three sections. | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 15:39 | answer | added | Majenko | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 15:00 | comment | added | HDatta | Dont worry about that. The if statement conditions state that when only one PIR detects motion, then the robot turns towards that side. Then it again checks the outputs. | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:56 | history | edited | HDatta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jan 24, 2016 at 14:21 | comment | added | Majenko | PIR sensors only detect moving heat sources. That is, moving relative to the PIR sensor. If the PIR sensor is moving then everything is moving relative to it, so who knows what it will be detecting. PIR is not, IMHO. a good choice for this kind of thing. | |
| Jan 24, 2016 at 13:46 | history | asked | HDatta | CC BY-SA 3.0 |