Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 1
    This is exactly the method I use for testing development boards I make. A shield is attached which links 50% of the pins to the other 50% through 100r resistors. Scanning the pins with one set low checks for both proper continuity as well as shorts to other pins. Commented Jul 10, 2018 at 22:39
  • 1
    Beautiful. This is the paradigm I was missing. It totally hadn't occurred to me that I could actually measure under different configurations in rapid succession. My options for building things just exploded. I'll try it out. Commented Jul 11, 2018 at 5:57
  • This worked wonderfully. I much prefer it over my analog approach, as I don't need to worry about defining expected voltage ranges for each input. And of course, I didn't need to check all 12*11/2 combinations, since I really just need to know which wires are connected to each terminal (6*6 checks) - if two terminals or two wires were connected, it would necessarily result in the wrong combination of wires connected to a given terminal. It is however important to check for more than the expected 6 connections, to handle the case where the user somehow bridges all the terminals. Thanks! Commented Jul 12, 2018 at 5:04