Timeline for About arduino serial communication
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2015 at 0:50 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jan 3, 2015 at 1:07 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2015 at 23:32 | comment | added | Anonymous Penguin | What baud rate are you using? | |
| Jan 2, 2015 at 22:05 | history | edited | Gerben | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| Jan 2, 2015 at 19:34 | comment | added | Chris Stratton | Also note that on direct connections such as you likely have, failure is extremely infrequent - if you are seeing it, then likely you either have software which does not service the channel frequently enough to avoid missing data, or else extreme electrical noise. While protocol-level integrity can be useful (especially where misoperation has real consequences), in a scheme that shouldn't be failing you should spend some time trying to understand why it is. | |
| Jan 2, 2015 at 19:32 | comment | added | Chris Stratton | You seem to be freely intermixing three extremely distinct concepts - Arduino "serial" which tends to mean UART-style asynchronous, "packets" a concept for which the previous serial has no inherent support, and then a rather random i2c tag, which is something else entirely (a shared synchronous signalling scheme). Step one is going to be to sort out what specifically and exactly you are asking about. | |
| Jan 2, 2015 at 19:19 | answer | added | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 2, 2015 at 19:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 3, 2015 at 7:28 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2015 at 19:06 | history | asked | Galvanico | CC BY-SA 3.0 |