Skip to main content
Database Administrators

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • 3
    Hi @indyK1ng ... I notice that you seem to have asked a few questions on the site, but that you've not given a lot of commentary on the questions. The site is focused on community INTERACTION and one of the ways we do that is by accepting good quality answers and giving feedback when answers don't help us. I would like to encourage you to either accept answers or add commentary where they don't help. Thanks!
    – jcolebrand ♦
    Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 1:03
  • Unfortunately I'm in a bit of an awkward situation. I committed back when the proposal was the broader termed databases, didn't pay attention then saw this go into private beta before I knew it was changed to Database Administrators. I am more interested in the innards of databases, but want to fulfill my commitment. Sorry.
    – indyK1ng
    Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 1:15
  • 1
    So what's stopping you from asking those sorts of questions? Go over to Meta, examine. We want to ask those questions too. Or do you intend that you wanted more indepth information on how NoSQL works in it's internals? I can go into that too, but didn't feel it was the scope of this question.
    – jcolebrand ♦
    Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 1:24
  • 1
    Also, accepting isn't a sin even if you don't want to be here, and it helps those from google or the like. I'm not saying "accept all my answers, I need the rep" as you can see if you visit my profile, I don't. I am more interested in seeing that future users can benefit from the direction provided by "this is what the asker found useful".
    – jcolebrand ♦
    Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 1:26
  • @jcolebrand I thought that those kinds of questions were considered off topic just judging from the name change. That's why This question and a few of my other questions were worded the way they were, so they would be on the side of on topic. Thanks for letting me know, I'll start being more active once I have the chance (college is doing its best to take up my time, I'm procrastinating right now ;) ).
    – indyK1ng
    Commented Jan 28, 2011 at 1:37