Timeline for Does database normalization belong here?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2013 at 3:11 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 19, 2013 at 21:24 | vote | accept | Simon Forsberg | ||
| Dec 19, 2013 at 21:22 | answer | added | JamalMod | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 22:34 | comment | added | 200_success | In January 2011, the general sentiment was that database design reviews were on-topic for Code Review. However, considering that DBA.SE launched around the same time, the issue is worth revisiting. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 19:38 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | More questions under [database-design] have been closed, but not all of them. I'd recommend having the wiki edited to mention that code must be provided, otherwise the question belongs on DBA.SE. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 19:21 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | @mikeTheLiar: Basically, there must already be code to review. The other questions I've closed had no code. I'm not sure about the question in that Meta post because I cannot tell if that is code or not. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 19:17 | comment | added | User1000547 | @Jamal is this older question (which is the reason that I posted my now-closed question here as opposed to elsewhere) now out of date? | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 19:10 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | Update: they're all off-topic, and I've closed them. I'll review the database tags further to see if there are similar questions. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 19:00 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | I don't have enough personal experience to determine this myself, but I can still close any questions as needed. If you or someone feels confident about this, those questions can be retagged. | |
| Dec 16, 2013 at 17:40 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 16, 2013 at 15:59 | history | edited | Malachi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed some wording
|
| Dec 16, 2013 at 15:39 | history | asked | Simon Forsberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |