Timeline for Code-Challenge #2
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 13:09 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 18, 2014 at 15:21 | comment | added | Corbin | @ChrisW I'm afraid I just agree. Lately linked list have become quite a bore. Hopefully though, people would implement more interesting containers, and, by the end of April, maybe the Great Linked List Surge of March will have been forgotten. | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 14:31 | comment | added | ChrisW | "It's just fun to implement standard containers :)." -- IMHO it has become no longer a huge amount of fun to review standard containers: how many "linked list" implementations do you want to review? | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 20:36 | comment | added | Corbin | @skiwi It could be, but it's not required to meet the criteria of the challenge. In general though, unless someone is already very familiar with non-concurrent containers, I would discourage the concurrent route. Performant concurrent containers can get very tricky very quickly. | |
| Mar 15, 2014 at 20:30 | comment | added | skiwi |
@PeterTaylor For Java, I think that you want to implement the interface, while mimicking the design of the concrete implementation. So you could be mimicking ArrayList, while implementing the List interface.
|
|
| Mar 15, 2014 at 20:26 | comment | added | skiwi | Should concurrency be a consideration for this challenge? | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 18:37 | comment | added | Corbin |
@PeterTaylor It was just to be consistent with the C++ suggestions since ArrayList and HashMap are more or less the Java analogues of std::vector and std::unordered_map. In an actual implementation, the interface would be implemented. It's just that the implementation might act as one of those concrete classes. (And don't forget that the rules are pretty open -- any container can be implemented)
|
|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 18:35 | comment | added | Corbin | @Mat'sMug Correct. | |
| Mar 11, 2014 at 12:28 | comment | added | Peter Taylor |
Is it intentional that the Java suggestions are classes rather than interfaces (java.util.List, java.util.Map)?
|
|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 2:40 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon |
So in C# that would be implementing a Stack<T> or a Queue<T>, or a List<T>, or whatever?
|
|
| Mar 10, 2014 at 19:45 | history | answered | Corbin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |