Timeline for Code requiring a third-party pre-processor to make it work
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2014 at 22:05 | comment | added | nhgrif | I agree with removal of the Java tag. Objective-C is just C with a really stronk pre-processor. The first thing that happens to any Objective-C source code is that it's pre-processed into C source code, but you don't see Objective-C questions being tagged C... Xcode will even generate the C-version of the code it's about to be compiled, I believe. | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 12:34 | comment | added | konijn | @200_success It is not Java if it does not compile without the preprocessor, I would agree with you if the code compiled but missed some features because of annotations not being interpreted. | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 6:57 | comment | added | 200_success | But this question is still recognizably Java. It just uses a few third-party annotations, that's all. | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 12:54 | history | answered | konijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |