Return to Question

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4) - DONE!

• 10K: 100% (10/10) (+3) - DONE!

• 3K: 50% (40/80) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 48.33% (59/120) - +1 over last week, PCG 0!

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 61.25% (49/80) (+9) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+18) - we're catching up!

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4) - DONE!

• 10K: 100% (10/10) (+3) - DONE!

• 3K: 50% (40/80) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 48.33% (59/120) - +1 over last week, PCG 0!

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 61.25% (49/80) (+9) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+18) - we're catching up!

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4) - DONE!

• 10K: 100% (10/10) (+3) - DONE!

• 3K: 50% (40/80) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 48.33% (59/120) - +1 over last week, PCG 0!

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 61.25% (49/80) (+9) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+18) - we're catching up!

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4) - DONE!

• 10K: 100% (10/10) (+3) - DONE!

• 3K: 50% (40/80) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 48.33% (59/120) - +1 over last week, PCG 0!

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 61.25% (49/80) (+9) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+18) - we're catching up!

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4)

• 10K: 90% (9/10) (+2)

• 3K: 50% (40/80)

• 2K: 48.33% (58/120)

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 60% (48/80) (+8)

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+19)

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps

#PCG.SE is going on a mission.

And so the race begins. For Code Review!! -- syb0rg 2 days ago

Let's see:

Programming Puzzles and Code Golf Voting & Activity

_{PCG.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Compare to:

Code Review Voting & Activity

_{CR.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Or, as has been established before, a more comparable freshly-graduated site:

Web Applications Voting & Activity

_{WebApps.SE Voting and Activity Chart}

Look at the chart scales: PCG's goes up to 8K. Ours? 2K. Neither are graduated sites. WebApps' scale goes up to 800.

Conclusion:

Both sites are apparently headed into the right direction, but...

PCG's mission is trying to hit the same nail as we are, and that boils down to the breakdown of avid users.

I have forked @doorknob's query and made a single query that selects everything in one pass here.

The targets have been set:

• 3 20K users
• 10 10K users
• 80 3K users
• 120 2K users

This is where we stand, as of the last SEDE update - the figures under each rep cluster represent the %target achieved, and the query only accounts for users last seen in the last 60 days:

###Code Review

• 20K: 133% (4/3) (+4) - DONE!

• 10K: 100% (10/10) (+3) - DONE!

• 3K: 50% (40/80) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 48.33% (59/120) - +1 over last week, PCG 0!

###Code Golf

• 20K: 0% (0/3)

• 10K: 70% (7/10)

• 3K: 61.25% (49/80) (+9) - no changes on either side!

• 2K: 64.17% (77/120) (+18) - we're catching up!

##Let's beat them at their own game!

All ideas, comments and opinions are welcome.

This could also be a subject of discussion:

###WebApps