Timeline for Migrating to Software Engineering - v2
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 21, 2016 at 15:32 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body; edited title
|
| Apr 2, 2014 at 6:21 | comment | added | 200_success Mod | The new close reasons include links to Stack Overflow and Programmers. | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 21:18 | answer | added | rolfl | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 26, 2014 at 19:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/448912115190218753 | ||
| Mar 25, 2014 at 11:58 | comment | added | ChrisW | @SimonAndréForsberg Yes I think one could summarize what's on- and off-topic at Programmers. Perhaps that means looking at Programmer's Meta, and/or inviting their participation in the answer, and/or posting a question "Please summarize what is on- and off-topic?" on their meta. It's because a multi-sentence explanation might be necessary, too long for a close reason, that I thought of putting a link to a meta-topic in the close reason (instead of stuffing the whole explanation into the close reason itself). | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 11:46 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | I love the idea, but I think the Programmers part needs some more clarity. As it is currently worded, it sounds like the short question "How can I make a Java game?" (almost "give me the codez") is on-topic there, but I believe it wouldn't be on-topic for Programmers unless you describe how you have planned it etc... kinda like a "Design review without any code written" (Please correct me if I'm wrong) | |
| Mar 25, 2014 at 9:27 | answer | added | ChrisW | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 24, 2014 at 13:41 | comment | added | ChrisW | See also Changing wording of the code-to-be-written and working-code off-topic reasons | |
| Mar 24, 2014 at 13:40 | history | asked | ChrisW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |