Timeline for Reviewing software, not only code
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2014 at 17:06 | comment | added | Tomek Wyderka | Precisely Simon. I'm looking for such kind of review. Area51 is looking promising. Thanks! | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 16:40 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | As I understand it, the OP is looking for a different kind of review, with questions such as: "Is this monster in this RPG game good for players?", "Does this website and software provide a good user experience?". Such questions does not fit into Code Review. And btw, I didn't say that I was very fond of the idea of a "Software Review" site myself, but I'm saying that if that is what you are looking for, then Area51 is the way to go. | |
| Jun 16, 2014 at 16:36 | history | answered | Mathieu Guindon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |