Timeline for Is it too easy getting upvotes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Aug 15, 2014 at 12:46 | comment | added | Pimgd | ... I dunno, it's the english equivalent of "CODE" | |
| Aug 15, 2014 at 12:45 | comment | added | rolfl Mod | @Pimgd - i suggest that both posts are useful, and insightful. Both would get my upvote. Both constitute a valuable review. | |
| Aug 15, 2014 at 12:41 | comment | added | Pimgd | Expanding on this: Example: Post A points out a unsigned/signed mismatch in the code, and then explains in great detail the risks of mismatching signed and unsigned integers, referencing official documentation and explaining the performance issues behind it. Post B says "you've got naming issues, it should be named for what it is or does, you've got too much comments in your code, function abc should be split, functions b_1, b_2 and b_3 should be combined to to function b(int num). Post A is well researched and useful. Post B is not. Post A helps. Post B says "your code is wrong!" | |
| Aug 15, 2014 at 1:58 | comment | added | rolfl Mod | @hichris123 - I expect that if a post, to you, is "helpful, interesting, and well-researched", that it would not, from your perspective, be "lacking in details". If you are neither swayed positively, nor negatively with an answer, then don't vote. I am simply suggesting that you vote on the merits of the answer, not on the relative merits of one answer verses another. | |
| Aug 15, 2014 at 1:10 | comment | added | hichris123 | I wouldn't agree with all of this. If one answer is clearly lacking in details, but is "helpful, interesting, and well-researched"... should you upvote it? | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 17:59 | history | edited | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
emphasis on that's!
|
| Aug 14, 2014 at 17:53 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Aug 14, 2014 at 17:45 | vote | accept | IEatBagels | ||
| Aug 14, 2014 at 17:38 | history | answered | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |