Timeline for Are Monte Carlo algorithms off-topic by definition?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 at 11:08 | history | edited | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 437 characters in body
|
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:24 | comment | added | Nobody moving away from SE | It was just an example for a clearly off-topic Monte Carlo question to identify criteria that help determine whether a Monte Carlo question would be off-topic. | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:22 | comment | added | Pimgd | Looks like a trivial task to me, why are you using monte-carlo for trivial tasks | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:21 | comment | added | Nobody moving away from SE | I have updated the question a bit and pose the same question to you as to @Simon. | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:15 | history | edited | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
probabiltity optional
|
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:14 | comment | added | Pimgd | hadn't thought of that... I guess the probability is optional | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:11 | comment | added | Nobody moving away from SE | So it is off-topic if the code fails to hit the stated probability? Even worse: what if the OP has no idea about the probability? | |
| Aug 22, 2014 at 10:09 | history | answered | Pimgd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |