There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)
• Code appending dot to string

How should we handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.

There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)
• Code appending dot to string

How should we handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.

There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)
• Code appending dot to string

How to handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.

There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)
• Code appending dot to string

How should we handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.

There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)

How to handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.

There has been primarily two questions that have been severely down-voted because of the code being childish / immature / possible "trolling".

• Derpifying Images
• Gay-o-meter (deleted)
• Code appending dot to string

How to handle such questions where the code in the question is just.... silly / childish / immature?

Moderator Note: I (rolfl) have taken the liberty of deleting that second question. I see no reason why a question titled "Gay-o-meter" adds any value to the site. The same program could have been written with any other title, "Length-o-meter", etc. The only reason to call it "Gay-o-meter" is to provoke controversy and more.

Users with sufficient reputation can still view that question, which disappoints me, actually. It should be 'more' deleted than it currently is.