Timeline for Confused by FAQ
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2013 at 10:15 | comment | added | AndrewC | I also found this confusing, so rephrasing "conducting code reviews" to "how to conduct code reviews" would be clearer. | |
| Sep 1, 2011 at 7:00 | comment | added | Herbert | @sepp2k: I get what you're saying, but the FAQ really should clarify this better. It's kind of confusing and could lead to a lot more questions like this. IMHO. | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 11:30 | vote | accept | Majid Fouladpour | ||
| Aug 29, 2011 at 11:30 | comment | added | Majid Fouladpour | Thanks. I have had first question closed on other SE sites, so I wanted to make sure I will not be asking an off-topic. I can see that a fair amount of effort has been put into compiling the FAQ too, but it still leaves room for opposing interpretations. Your answer here clears those for me though. | |
| Aug 29, 2011 at 11:22 | history | answered | sepp2kMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |