- Contact the moderators of the originating sites, to explain clearly why the migrated posts shouldn't have been migrated
- I would expect those moderators to disseminate our conclusions in their community, and educate their users, perhaps in meta and blog posts. We would work together with them to make the message as clear as possible, and prevent further bad migrations in the future
I'm not a big fan of promises.
Promises by other people don't mean a lot to me.
Do, or do not. Don't promise.
Instead of promises, II give you the following facts that might guide you better than promises:
Yes, I do considering voting a moderation toolI'm very conscious of my vote actions, especially
especially when it'scasting the first on a postvote,
because sometimes it can start an avalanche,
which can go both ways. A +1 or
The first downvote can trigger gang-1 often seemsdownvoting by trigger-happy users.
Downvotes also bruise egos,
so for the friendly image of the site,
I very rarely downvote inexperienced users,
and guide them with comments instead.
The first upvote is also dangerous on poor posts,
as it misleads those wanting to givelearn,
setting a different lightbad precedent.
I often hover the mouse over the arrow buttons to a postre-read their tooltip, sometimes it seems
which either help making the start of an avalanchefinal decision, or I just move on without voting.
I don't vote up-down willy-nilly.
I
I often remind the Santas of the chat room to not upvote without thinking.
I think I downvote enough. But
But maybe I upvote a bit too much.
I will be more committed to moderation activities.
It'sSo far I've been just a responsibilityuser,
and focused more on enjoying the site than participating in moderation.
The moderator role comes with serious responsibilities that I will have to fulfill.
I take responsibilities seriously, and
and make sure I wouldn't want todon't let the community down those counting on me.