Timeline for Size out [code-size-optimization] and [minification]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 13:09 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 1, 2016 at 16:09 | vote | accept | MastMod | ||
| Jul 20, 2015 at 19:29 | comment | added | nhgrif | Right... this answer isn't really about [minification]. | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 17:33 | comment | added | rolfl | Two things - in almost all cases where minification is useful (like Javascript client code), there are tools that are used to do the minification for you, and the "source code" is not the minimized code, but the pre-processed code. As a result, the minimized code is not suitable for review. In the event though, that your program is specifically about processing pre-minimized code to minimized code, and, if there's a reasonable number of questions with a similar theme, then the "minimization" tag may become useful to represent the "task" that the code is doing, not the "type" of review | |
| Jul 20, 2015 at 17:31 | history | edited | rolfl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
couple of typos corrected.
|
| Jul 19, 2015 at 18:40 | comment | added | nhgrif | Right. This meta question is strictly for [code-size-optimization]. Minification is the only valid use for the tag I could possibly imagine, and yet no one is currently using [code-size-optimization] on any questions that would otherwise be tagged [minification]. We can talk about [minification] as a tag if it's ever created. | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 18:37 | comment | added | RubberDuck | I was browsing through the Qs earlier and the only one I'm sketchy on is the TI-80 question. It has similar constraints as embedded programming, but really isn't embedded programming. Not sure what to do with that one, but I think this tag needs burnt. I'm also undecided about creating a "minification" tag, but I suppose we can cross that bridge if it ever really comes up. | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 18:31 | comment | added | nhgrif | If I've somehow missed a logical use-case for the tag, please let me know. | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 18:30 | history | answered | nhgrif | CC BY-SA 3.0 |