Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10, 2020 at 13:09 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Oct 22, 2015 at 15:10 comment added Mathieu Guindon Mod @rolfl nothing should be stopping them, we want these edits. now how do I review-ban myself? Note that this "anti-solution" answer is saying exactly that: "it's completely the reviewer's responsibility to make sure they're taking the right decision." and "As reviewers, the first thing we need to ask ourselves should be "is this a question or an answer edit?"" - this answer is saying the problem is with the reviewers, not with the answer edits.
Oct 22, 2015 at 15:02 comment added rolfl Users are encouraged to make good edits. You should not make users have to jump through ugly hoops because reviewers are too lazy and rushed to do their jobs properly. This is an anti-solution. The reviewer who rejected those edits should be review-banned, or warned ;-)
Oct 22, 2015 at 15:01 comment added rolfl But we are stack exchange..... also note that, after users have enough rep, there's no review queue at all - what's stopping people then?
Oct 22, 2015 at 15:00 comment added Mathieu Guindon Mod @rolfl but, we're not Stack Overflow ;-)
Oct 22, 2015 at 14:59 comment added rolfl How many time have you seen this on Stack Overflow: "Shouldn't Foo be Bar instead? - User1234 3 minutes ago" and nothing else?
Oct 22, 2015 at 13:59 history answered Mathieu GuindonMod CC BY-SA 3.0