Skip to main content

Timeline for Post wrongly marked as duplicate

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 20, 2019 at 20:50 vote accept Sorin GFS
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
Dec 30, 2015 at 18:52 comment added EcstaticSnow This is hilarious just reading the arguments.
Dec 20, 2015 at 0:16 answer added Mathieu GuindonMod timeline score: 14
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:21 comment added Sorin GFS Ok, I'm not going to extend this any further, those methods aren't doing the same job. The fact is nobody didn't really tried to see what can be done with that code. Take just this: if it's not for excel... obviously it's for something else.
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:16 comment added RubberDuck I don't know, because you can just use the Enumerable class, and the Linq extension methods for Enumerable to do the job of the code you wrote. What is it for?
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:14 comment added Sorin GFS Yes, you removed the tag correctly, I didn't said anything about it. But if it's not for excel, what it is for? :)
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:14 answer added joranvar timeline score: 10
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:14 comment added RubberDuck Then there's no reason to reopen it. If you wish to share your code, post it on GitHub. This site is for improving your code, not sharing it with the world.
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:12 comment added Sorin GFS Doesn't really matter for me if the post will be reopened or not. I'm not doing this for points, or for anything else. It's about how can others use or not a part of my work, it's about sharing.
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:10 comment added RubberDuck I removed the excel tag because it didn't apply to the question...
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:10 comment added RubberDuck Because VB.Net was made to be (mostly) backwards compatible with VB6. That's how. However, a review in a .Net context would be a considerably different review from what you'd get in a VB6 context. So, maybe it's not a straight duplicate. Either way, are you sure you want this reopened? You're may not like the answers you're going to get.
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:09 comment added Sorin GFS @RubberDuck, you removed my excel tag, lol, so even you made me to post the original purpose of the code: vb.net version! :)
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:06 comment added Sorin GFS Yes. How can be a duplicate a code made for another language? Read carefully that page, you can see that I made public the vb,net version as a reaction to Zak's comment. He didn't understand how the vba code can be used with excel, and as a response I said that... it isn't for excel! :)
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:02 comment added RubberDuck > the only difference is the language used: vb.net versus vba. I did post this using vb.net tag for those who are looking specifically for vb.net based code. – Sorin GFS 6 hours ago
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:02 comment added RubberDuck You said yourself that the question is a duplicate. codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/114456/…
Dec 19, 2015 at 23:00 comment added Sorin GFS @RubberDuck you can try yourself, just "slap" the initial vba code into a class in visual studio... see what happens!
Dec 19, 2015 at 22:53 comment added Sorin GFS You totally wrong here. I don't have any excel application made for that code, the application which is the code for... is in vb.net! See the link above. While I did the code in VBA I took care not to put anything incompatible with vb.net
Dec 19, 2015 at 22:47 comment added RubberDuck You didn't "rewrite" this for VB.Net, you slapped your VB6 code into a class and posted a new question without making any meaningful changes or improvements to the code.
Dec 19, 2015 at 22:39 comment added Sorin GFS Here you can find one more proof..
Dec 19, 2015 at 22:18 history asked Sorin GFS CC BY-SA 3.0