Timeline for Could Code Review also serve as a code repository? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 31, 2016 at 1:59 | comment | added | Loki Astari |
Code repositories provide other features not included here. Like version control. Easy sharing (forking). Easy integration of contributers code (pull requests). Issue tracking. Branching. etc.... I just use github account it's free and you can have unlimited private projects. Also code review provides integration with github for badges: [](http://codereview.stackexchange.com/q/<questionID>/<userID>) See: github.com/Loki-Astari/ThorsSerializer/blob/master/README.md
|
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 0:44 | history | closed | JamalMod | Duplicate of For an iterative review, is it okay to edit my own question to include revised code? | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 0:43 | comment | added | Jamal Mod | That's actually mentioned in the linked question as quoted: You also should not append your revised code to the question. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 0:41 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 0:31 | answer | added | Quill | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 0:08 | history | asked | Eka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |