Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

#No.

No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

#No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

#No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly saysclose-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

#No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

#No.

If we look at the close-reason meta thread, it clearly says:

We also expect you to understand how your code works. If you are seeking an explanation of how your code works, then we will treat the question as if someone else wrote it.

And that is off-topic, 100%.

Source Link
Peilonrayz Mod
  • 44.6k
  • 33
  • 78
Loading