Timeline for Can we have collapsible code blocks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 9, 2016 at 10:50 | answer | added | PeilonrayzMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 12, 2014 at 18:58 | history | edited | JamalMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jan 30, 2011 at 0:48 | answer | added | bob-the-destroyer | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 18:42 | comment | added | RobertPitt |
I do not like it too much, I think the view port for the code block is good enough (over X lines, scroll the rest). Maybe if we could specify what parts of the code were collapsing, maybe [collapse:22]\r\n class X{ ... and this would collapse 22 lines down. so we can specifically hid methods, classes that are less important but posted in case.
|
|
| Jan 23, 2011 at 18:07 | history | edited | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 148 characters in body; added 21 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2011 at 17:45 | history | edited | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Improved example
|
| Jan 21, 2011 at 16:31 | history | edited | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 373 characters in body; edited body
|
| Jan 20, 2011 at 19:08 | history | asked | Jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |