Timeline for Should code block(s) as answers always require an explanation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2024 at 13:07 | history | edited | MastMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 23, 2014 at 1:04 | history | edited | rolflMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add link to original version
|
| Feb 21, 2014 at 22:23 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 26, 2013 at 2:12 | history | edited | JamalMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 21, 2013 at 6:25 | vote | accept | Jamal | ||
| Oct 1, 2013 at 15:35 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
| Sep 30, 2013 at 13:36 | answer | added | Gareth Rees | timeline score: -3 | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 12:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/380666778571276288 | ||
| Sep 18, 2013 at 8:17 | comment | added | Jamal | @Bobby: Agreed, especially the closing statement. :-) | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 8:14 | comment | added | Bobby | I think much that discussion is still relevant, especially the answer from CasperOne. | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 8:01 | answer | added | Bobby | timeline score: 20 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 7:58 | comment | added | Jamal | @Bobby: I anticipated this, but I figured it would be a slightly different case for here. That could still be part of this discussion. | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 7:50 | comment | added | Bobby | Related discussion on Meta.SO: Is there any benefit to allowing code-only answers while blocking code-only questions? | |
| Sep 17, 2013 at 15:10 | history | asked | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |