Return to Question

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not syntactically valid javascript, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter apply to the former? As such, does javascript not apply?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because he/she wants to work towards badge progress on that tag.

Perhaps this is akin to c++ where c doesn’t apply- if so, just say so.

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not syntactically valid javascript, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter apply to the former? As such, does javascript not apply?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because they want to work towards badge progress on that tag.

Perhaps this is akin to c++ where c doesn’t apply- if so, just say so.

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not syntactically valid javascript, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter apply to the former?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because he/she wants to work towards badge progress on that tag.

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not syntactically valid javascript, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter apply to the former? As such, does javascript not apply?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because he/she wants to work towards badge progress on that tag.

Perhaps this is akin to c++ where c doesn’t apply- if so, just say so.

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not the same as javascript and ecmascript-6, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter two apply to the former?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because he/she wants to work towards badge progress on that tag.

Many posts are tagged with jsx as well as javascript and sometimes ecmascript-6, but then those latter tags are often removed by others.

While I understand that jsx is not syntactically valid javascript, isn't it the case that many of the same concepts of the latter apply to the former?

For instance, if a question with jsx has a bunch of code where variables are declared with let, an answer might include advice to use const wherever it makes sense. But if somebody looking to answer such a question sees that javascript was removed from the question then that person might be apt to skip the question because he/she wants to work towards badge progress on that tag.