Timeline for Understanding closed question concerns
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2020 at 20:29 | answer | added | PeilonrayzMod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 20:06 | comment | added | Mast Mod | If you could alleviate some of the concerns, perhaps reopening would be more constructive than guessing at what the reviewers thought was intolerable about your question. I can make a couple of guesses as to why it could be considered off-topic, but it's a bit of a grey area and I don't like guesswork. | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 18:48 | comment | added | Li Brary | @Mast gotcha! good to know | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 18:47 | comment | added | Mast Mod | Old posts may have been posted under old policy, please don't use those as example. Especially that old. | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 18:31 | comment | added | Li Brary | not line for line in any way. Perhaps, that's what confused the moderators? The chapter was about making duck objects, but their code was in Java a language that allows for interfaces, so I was fumbling using javascript which doesn't require them. Thanks for assisting! | |
| Feb 13, 2020 at 18:17 | history | edited | Li Brary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 13, 2020 at 17:34 | history | asked | Li Brary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |