Skip to main content
Code Review

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 5
replaced http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/ with https://codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 5

We did host our own election, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site.

http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/903/beta-site-in-need-of-new-moderatorCode Review is in need of a new moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. We are preparing ourselves for elections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a graduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, I have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to other users on the site

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the code looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

We did host our own election, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site.

http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/903/beta-site-in-need-of-new-moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. We are preparing ourselves for elections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a graduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, I have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to other users on the site

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the code looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

We did host our own election, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site.

Code Review is in need of a new moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. We are preparing ourselves for elections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a graduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, I have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to other users on the site

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the code looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

deleted 42 characters in body
Source Link
Jamal Mod
Jamal Mod
  • 35.2k
  • 2
  • 54
  • 106

We did host our own Electionelection, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site.

Beta site in need of new Moderatorhttp://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/903/beta-site-in-need-of-new-moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. ie: We We are preparing ourselves for Electionselections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a Graduatedgraduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, II have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to Other Usersother users on the Sitesite

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code.

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the Codecode looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

We did host our own Election, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site

Beta site in need of new Moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. ie: We are preparing ourselves for Elections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a Graduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, I have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to Other Users on the Site

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code.

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the Code looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

We did host our own election, just to let SE know that we are serious about our site, granted neither of the parties has yet reached Trusted user Status, but both are engaged in day to day activities on the site.

http://meta.codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/903/beta-site-in-need-of-new-moderator

I know that we haven't graduated yet, but we wanted SE to know that we are thinking about the future of the site. We are preparing ourselves for elections, and other things that will come our way in terms of a graduated site.

I have also noticed one user that has risen past the 1.5k rep mark in less than 2 months here on the site, obviously answering a lot of questions, with really good answers.

I have also noticed that some users have actually come back to Code Review after not participating for a long period of time, and those users reputation has risen fairly quickly as well.

As far as the unanswered questions, I have been looking at some of the oldest questions that have no votes, and some of them were off topic, but most of them were not properly tagged. and yet others have huge blocks of code that take a while to actually read through, let alone give a reasonable answer. That is only in the tags that I work in most.

Note to other users on the site

Not all of our answers have to hit everything that is wrong with the code

This means that we can/should leave shorter answers even if the question is begging for more review, a lot of us are reviewing in between writing code and waiting for code to compile or whatever, and leaving shorter answers should (IS) okay. this will also leave room for allowing ( asking ) the OP to vote on all the answers that gave a good review to their code.

We can post more than one answer on a question

I think this would give us more voting opportunities (up/down), because it would allow us, and other users, to pick the best reviews on the question and up vote them, and down vote the answers that are very low quality or don't fit the code/question.

For Code Review where the code looks pretty good

We can also answer these questions with what the Code does well, as opposed to what needs to be changed, this is still a review. We do need to make sure that we explain why it is good coding practice or why it is efficient, so that it is a good review.

added some more information
Source Link
Malachi
Malachi
  • 29.1k
  • 23
  • 49
Source Link
Malachi
Malachi
  • 29.1k
  • 23
  • 49