This publication has been closed; without any kind of support from this community or explanation, at least the people who voted to close it should be a little more objective and at least read the question before closing, although I doubt it, it seems to me that there are trolls who are only walking closing questions from new people in this community.
After this complaint, I have verified, Edited and added all the possible context of the question. but the main problem is that they have closed it without reading and the argument by which it was closed is out of context: This is a script that works independently; and it is not part of another project. The script and question are not subject to: Pseudocode, stub code, hypothetical code, obfuscated code, and generic best practices.
It is a functional and detailed code, which I want to be revised.
- Application of best practices and design pattern usage
- Potential security issues
- Performance
- Correctness in unanticipated cases
