Timeline for Should Mos Eisley have non-moderator owners, and if so, who?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
37 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://scifi.stackexchange.com/ with https://scifi.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 29, 2015 at 21:11 | comment | added | corsiKa | @randal'thor If smart-ass posts weren't allowed, I'm not sure I'd have much of a presence on any Stack Exchange, except possibly SQA where I'm a diamond. | |
| Sep 22, 2015 at 19:59 | comment | added | ThePopMachine | @MikeEdenfield: Who made the graphics?! | |
| Sep 19, 2015 at 8:47 | history | edited | ValorumMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 598 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 18:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSciFi/status/644578017105342465 | ||
| Sep 17, 2015 at 16:49 | history | edited | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 162 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 8:26 | comment | added | SQB | I think it's important that any nominee indicates if they actually want to, preferably by commenting on their nomination. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 8:23 | answer | added | SQB | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 8:17 | history | edited | SQB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Another important criterion.
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 8:04 | comment | added | Often Right | @randal'thor in any matters I would always try to act impartially, irrespective of who was involved (including anyone who goes by the name of 'Data', 'Lore', 'B4' and 'Richard') | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 8:00 | answer | added | Often Right | timeline score: -3 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 7:19 | history | edited | Wad Cheber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 4:05 | comment | added | JMFB | +1 good suggestion, and we should be able to purchase Star trek ranks, that was a good idea as well. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 1:06 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @Mooz I posted my first 4 answers without any implied +1; unfortunately it means I can't vote for the ones I want but that shouldn't be a problem unless it's close. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 1:01 | comment | added | Wad Cheber | @randal'thor - Being a smartass is irrelevant, he's never said anything offensive, in my experience. Being silly is fine, being argumentative or inappropriate (like some Wads who shall remain nameless) is not. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:56 | comment | added | Möoz | Can we agree that each post has an inherent +1, just because we can't up-vote our own nominations? | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:54 | answer | added | Möoz | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:51 | history | edited | Wad Cheber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 169 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:49 | comment | added | KutuluMike | @Mooz lets limit this to mos eisley, please. we only have one other standing room, and it's tiny, and the ownership issue is entirely up to the person who created it. Mos Eisley is special in that it's our site's main chat. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:48 | history | edited | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 366 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:48 | history | edited | Wad Cheber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 166 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:44 | comment | added | Major Stackings | randal'thor is not wrong. @randal'thor no offense taken. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:44 | comment | added | Möoz | @MikeEdenfield I added some additional details from the transcript, feel free to rollback / add / edit :) | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:43 | history | edited | Möoz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added extra details, edited tags.
|
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:35 | answer | added | Often Right | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:22 | comment | added | Wad Cheber | @randal'thor Richard is a mod. He won't be flagged anyway. No one can flag him, because he can unflag himself. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:19 | answer | added | Often Right | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:17 | answer | added | Often Right | timeline score: 14 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:17 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:17 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | There is at least one frequenter of Mos Eisley who's never had any serious rows with anyone there and is good enough at getting along with everyone that he even managed to stay on good terms with both Richard and SS-Pi... | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:13 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | @WadCheber I support Slytherincess, definitely. But N_Soong is widely known to be non-impartial at least when it comes to Richard, and Major Stackings is a great maker of smartass chat posts himself... (No offence meant!) | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:12 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:07 | comment | added | Wad Cheber | Impartiality is key. As is being widely respected and trusted. Hence, I suggest Slytherincess, N_Soong, Praxis, and Major Stackings. | |
| Sep 17, 2015 at 0:03 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor Mod | What qualities should these room owners have? They should be often in chat, obviously. Should they be quiet or talkative? Chatty or not? Opinionated or not? Etc. | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 23:58 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 24 | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 23:53 | answer | added | KutuluMike | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 16, 2015 at 23:53 | history | asked | KutuluMike | CC BY-SA 3.0 |