Skip to main content
added 84 characters in body
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

That is right, posted code fragment does look like assembly language. The proper conversion of this code would define the version.

Edit: it has some specific language for this device, but it is not assembly.

It is also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

That is right, posted code fragment does look like assembly language. The proper conversion of this code would define the version.

It is also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

That is right, posted code fragment does look like assembly language. The proper conversion of this code would define the version.

Edit: it has some specific language for this device, but it is not assembly.

It is also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

Formatting
Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

YesThat is right, thisposted code fragment does look like looks like assemblyassembly language. However, you need to findThe proper conversion of this code would define the correct version.

It is also look like a USSR made calculator. Does Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

Yes, this looks like assembly language. However, you need to find the correct version.

It also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

That is right, posted code fragment does look like assembly language. The proper conversion of this code would define the version.

It is also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?

Source Link
Yusubov
  • 21.5k
  • 6
  • 47
  • 71

Yes, this looks like assembly language. However, you need to find the correct version.

It also look like a USSR made calculator. Does it run on rounded batteries/cord?