Skip to main content
replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link

Short answer

Easy. Any Windows network-share, announced in LAN, can be mounted as additional local drive on any host in LAN and resources on this share will be presented as local to local OS. Just do it

Longer answer

Microsoft SMB Protocol is still the poorest and worst choice over alternatives - especially for case more complex, than just "share text/plain files". If you can, it will be better to invest some time, attention, money into investigation and deploy SMB-alternatives (point onepoint one, point two) from the very beginning, than have disasters, interrupting business

PS: from my POV, local repos with remote bare-repo still is the most reasonable and natural way with no headache and transparent workflow without carefully scattered garden rakes in the grass

Short answer

Easy. Any Windows network-share, announced in LAN, can be mounted as additional local drive on any host in LAN and resources on this share will be presented as local to local OS. Just do it

Longer answer

Microsoft SMB Protocol is still the poorest and worst choice over alternatives - especially for case more complex, than just "share text/plain files". If you can, it will be better to invest some time, attention, money into investigation and deploy SMB-alternatives (point one, point two) from the very beginning, than have disasters, interrupting business

PS: from my POV, local repos with remote bare-repo still is the most reasonable and natural way with no headache and transparent workflow without carefully scattered garden rakes in the grass

Short answer

Easy. Any Windows network-share, announced in LAN, can be mounted as additional local drive on any host in LAN and resources on this share will be presented as local to local OS. Just do it

Longer answer

Microsoft SMB Protocol is still the poorest and worst choice over alternatives - especially for case more complex, than just "share text/plain files". If you can, it will be better to invest some time, attention, money into investigation and deploy SMB-alternatives (point one, point two) from the very beginning, than have disasters, interrupting business

PS: from my POV, local repos with remote bare-repo still is the most reasonable and natural way with no headache and transparent workflow without carefully scattered garden rakes in the grass

Source Link
Lazy Badger
  • 1.9k
  • 12
  • 16

Short answer

Easy. Any Windows network-share, announced in LAN, can be mounted as additional local drive on any host in LAN and resources on this share will be presented as local to local OS. Just do it

Longer answer

Microsoft SMB Protocol is still the poorest and worst choice over alternatives - especially for case more complex, than just "share text/plain files". If you can, it will be better to invest some time, attention, money into investigation and deploy SMB-alternatives (point one, point two) from the very beginning, than have disasters, interrupting business

PS: from my POV, local repos with remote bare-repo still is the most reasonable and natural way with no headache and transparent workflow without carefully scattered garden rakes in the grass