Skip to main content
Post Locked by Thomas Owens
Notice added Historical significance by Thomas Owens
Question Protected by maple_shaft
word choice
Source Link
Dogweather
  • 523
  • 3
  • 10

When looking at comparisons, it seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between their feature sets. Yet, an often cited statement is that "Mercurial is easier". What is the basebasis of this statement? (if any)

When looking at comparisons, it seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between their feature sets. Yet, an often cited statement is that "Mercurial is easier". What is the base of this statement? (if any)

When looking at comparisons, it seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between their feature sets. Yet, an often cited statement is that "Mercurial is easier". What is the basis of this statement? (if any)

Post Made Community Wiki by jammycakes
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/85141706583982080
Source Link
Tamás Szelei
  • 7.8k
  • 7
  • 41
  • 43

Why is Mercurial considered to be easier than Git?

When looking at comparisons, it seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between their feature sets. Yet, an often cited statement is that "Mercurial is easier". What is the base of this statement? (if any)