Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1
  • 1
    Okay, thanks for the reply. In my case though, what seems to have happened is that I had set the image size to be 320. However, the previous model seems to have been trained on 640 image size. Changing the image size to 640 for training seems to have significantly improved result. Previously with 320 image size, mAP50 in the second epoch of training was 0.0695. Now with 640, it is 0.731. Commented Apr 26, 2024 at 7:38