Skip to main content
Unix & Linux

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 3
    The reason you'd reload the history after every command is that it's the behaviour required by the question (and so this doesn't actually answer the question as posed). Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 9:42
  • 2
    @MichaelHomer Fair point. Feel free to downvote so the answer stays at the bottom, however, I would chalk this up to the OP not realising how bad the requested behaviour would be, and the fact that this is very googlable question. Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 10:46
  • 3
    Op here, yeah, that's a fair compromise. My main complaint is that I was losing history. This should stop that, even if it doesn't mean instant updates across simultaneous sessions. Commented Jul 23, 2015 at 12:44