Skip to main content

Timeline for answer to Possible plagiarism advice by xLeitix

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Post Revisions

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 30, 2018 at 23:28 comment added user541686 @Mast: I agree with DavidZ... plagiarism has always been "passing off someone else's idea as your own". I don't see how removing yourself as a co-author makes that messy -- it's still passing off someone's idea as your own. However, what I think does make it messy is the permission that was given. If they gave permission that you can pass the work off as your own, then you can call it plagiarism if you want, but it wouldn't make it unacceptable (otherwise employers are "plagiarizing" their employee's work, making the term useless). The question is whether this permission was given or not.
Jun 30, 2018 at 13:17 comment added Mast @DavidZ Usually you would be right. But since the author has removed himself as co-author, it gets messy.
Jun 30, 2018 at 7:51 comment added David Z I actually would call this plagiarism. My understanding of plagiarism has been that it encompasses pretty much any attempt to pass off ideas, words, images, etc. as your own when in fact they are not, and that's exactly what the other authors seem to be doing. But really, that's just a matter of terminology. No objections with how you're suggesting the asker handle the situation.
S Jun 29, 2018 at 17:29 history suggested Michael Mior CC BY-SA 4.0
improve grammar and readability
Jun 29, 2018 at 16:32 vote accept user_15
Jun 29, 2018 at 16:28 review Suggested edits
S Jun 29, 2018 at 17:29
Jun 29, 2018 at 14:29 history answered xLeitix CC BY-SA 4.0