Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 16, 2022 at 13:39 comment added onepound ...Usually authorship is agreed in advance and even then a certain amount of bitching can occur as to the order of names. It is especially infuriating when companies sponsor research - 10 people that did nothing usually are listed as authors.
Feb 16, 2022 at 13:39 comment added onepound did you contribute to the actual research? if not you do not really have any claim to the paper. Papers list the authors research contribution even if it is assumed not labour. A company might of say manufactured the project that does not mean they will get anything more than an acknowledgement. Same goes with writing. I know this is not what you'd like to hear and I do not necessarily agree with your treatment it's just my experience has been thus even though I researched at a world leading university. ...
Feb 16, 2022 at 7:45 answer added sanaris timeline score: 0
Feb 16, 2022 at 1:41 answer added user153480 timeline score: 0
Feb 15, 2022 at 20:16 comment added theAppFarmer Who provided the facts and interpretations for the paper's contents? Were any of those demonstrably your own contributions?
Feb 15, 2022 at 19:13 answer added M R timeline score: -2
Feb 15, 2022 at 15:42 comment added einpoklum Just to clarify - in the version you had written from scratch - did you list yourself as an author?
Feb 14, 2022 at 19:01 answer added einpoklum timeline score: 13
Feb 14, 2022 at 7:22 comment added Jyrki Lahtonen What was your role in the production of the content of the article? Did you just typeset the handwritten text given to you? Or was the content something you created from scratch? Something in-between? Talk with your immediate supervisor 1-on-1, and ask for their opinion as to whether you should be included. They can explain their views.
Feb 13, 2022 at 23:53 comment added user151413 When you say "write paragraphs", does that mean that you produced all the content in the paragraph as well, or that you just formulated out the content which was already there as a bullet point list or similar?
Feb 13, 2022 at 23:28 history edited cag51 CC BY-SA 4.0
removed --> omitted, pending clarification from OP
Feb 13, 2022 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1492876239115325443
Feb 13, 2022 at 13:30 comment added Greg Do you have all the drafts and communication with your supervisor about the review saved? In case it gets dirty, the better and more detailed proof you have that you done the work with the acknowledgment of your prof, the better your chances.
Feb 13, 2022 at 12:43 answer added PLL timeline score: 89
Feb 13, 2022 at 12:41 comment added Marc Glisse Did they remove your name, or is it possible that they just forgot to add it because they were only looking at the content of the paper?
Feb 13, 2022 at 9:13 history edited Ben CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Feb 13, 2022 at 9:10 answer added Ben timeline score: 10
Feb 13, 2022 at 9:04 history became hot network question
Feb 13, 2022 at 1:45 answer added rg_software timeline score: -7
Feb 13, 2022 at 1:23 answer added Allure timeline score: 11
Feb 13, 2022 at 1:03 history asked user134916 CC BY-SA 4.0