Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • 12
    I think this is mostly a good answer from a practical perspective, but OP also says "The dataset and analyses were handled incorrectly, and the published results are wrong and substantially different from my original findings". That seems to go a bit beyond a supervisor just polishing up some work for publication. Obviously more detailed info would be necessary to draw further judgment. Commented 2 days ago
  • 3
    @BryanKrause: Good point - I've edited to note that it may be necessary to add an erratum. Commented 2 days ago