Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 6
    If your belief about the student is correct, a fourth scenario is possible: The student does not care about the publication any more, but the supervisor thinks it is important enough to get published. At some point the student may even want to retract their name, just so s/he is not bothered further. Commented May 20, 2017 at 18:03
  • 8
    @user3697176 Even if the student didn't want their name as a co-author, surely they would merit an acknowledgement? Commented May 20, 2017 at 19:52
  • Are the copied parts central to the results of the paper, or are they mostly just background material? Commented May 20, 2017 at 21:23
  • Your third bullet point doesn't necessarily indicate something fishy. Commented May 20, 2017 at 21:24
  • 1
    No matter what the scenario, not citing the thesis seems to me plagiarism, (possibly self-plagiarism) even though answers to other questions seem to disagree. Commented Jul 27, 2017 at 8:54