Timeline for answer to Adding "real" creation date to scanned "old"pictures by nohillside
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 mins ago | comment | added | nohillside♦ | @ReinstateMonica3167040 I was able to create a 1964 timestamp on an APFS drive | |
| 5 hours ago | comment | added | ReinstateMonica3167040 | @slingeraap However, while Unix time can be negative, APFS time which also starts at January 1, 1970 cannot. | |
| 12 hours ago | history | edited | nohillside♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
| 12 hours ago | comment | added | nohillside♦ | @slingeraap Indeed, learned something new today. | |
| 13 hours ago | comment | added | slingeraap | For the record, Unix timestamps do go before 1970. The unix timestamp is defined as number of seconds since Jan 1st, 1970, but this number also has a negative range, which extends to as low as the year 1901. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | PLL | As far as I understand from the docs I’ve found (including the tag listing of ExifTool and the EXIF standard), ExifTool’s “CreateDate” is meant to be a synonym for the standard’s “DateTimeDigitized”, so in cases like OP’s, not the same as “DateTimeOriginal”, which is the one that’s supposed to represent the time the original photo was taken. | |
| yesterday | history | edited | nohillside♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| yesterday | history | edited | nohillside♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 89 characters in body
|
| yesterday | history | edited | Graham Miln | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added links.
|
| yesterday | history | answered | nohillside♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |