Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKMS, as does Nvidia.
To short for an answer, but I'll risk it:
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKMS, as does Nvidia.
Too short for an answer, but I'll risk it:
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKMS, as does Nvidia.
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKSMDKMS, as does Nvidia.
To short for an answer, but I'll risk it:
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKSM, as does Nvidia.
To short for an answer, but I'll risk it:
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKMS, as does Nvidia.
Yes, you have to patch the kernel every time. This is logical, and comparable with the update of proprietary modules, such as Nvidia. To automate patching, you could use DKSM, as does Nvidia.
