Timeline for answer to According to Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, what are the strongest apologetic arguments for the divine inspiration of the deuterocanonical books? by Jess
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2021 at 18:37 | history | edited | Jess | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Sep 22, 2021 at 18:35 | comment | added | Jess | It includes Lutheranism because the question is addressed to those who defend the deuterocanoncial books as Scripture. The Apology to the Augsburg Confession clearly references 2 Maccabees as "Scripture." Your quote from Wikipedia is based upon a comment from Norman Geisler that is incorrect. | |
| Sep 22, 2021 at 17:05 | comment | added | Ken Graham♦ | With the scope of the question limited to Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, your post deals extensively with Lutheranism. | |
| Sep 22, 2021 at 16:44 | comment | added | Ken Graham♦ | Your sources do not clearly indicate that that the Lutheran Church consider 2 Maccabees to be in the Canon of Scripture. As with the Lutheran Churches, the Anglican Communion accepts "the Apocrypha for instruction in life and manners, but not for the establishment of doctrine", and many "lectionary readings in The Book of Common Prayer are taken from the Apocrypha", with these lessons being "read in the same ways as those from the Old Testament". | |
| Sep 21, 2021 at 23:28 | history | edited | Jess | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 254 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2021 at 23:11 | history | answered | Jess | CC BY-SA 4.0 |