Skip to main content

Timeline for answer to Is this language allowed? by Doorknob

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

Post Revisions

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 6, 2017 at 18:07 comment added user62131 Just to clarify this for the OP: if you decided to write a new language with a builtin for every single challenge submitted to PPCG so far, and actually succeeded in implementing it, it'd be a pretty interesting and valid golfing language — but it wouldn't automatically expand to cover newly submitted challenges, and might or might not be competitive on them (although you can probably do some pretty crazy things using only PPCG challenges as builtins).
Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/ with https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/
Apr 15, 2014 at 12:46 comment added A.L There is also a rule for point 2: meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/1061/…
Apr 12, 2014 at 18:04 comment added Christopher King Also, for point 4, it is part of the language itself.
Apr 12, 2014 at 18:03 comment added Christopher King Also, I added an interpreter.
Apr 12, 2014 at 17:45 comment added Christopher King A dialect of haskell, sort of. It is the newest GHC compiler for haskell. It was recently released.
Apr 12, 2014 at 17:43 comment added Doorknob @PyRulez What is GHC 7.8.1...?
Apr 12, 2014 at 17:42 history edited Doorknob CC BY-SA 3.0
added 116 characters in body
Apr 12, 2014 at 17:42 comment added Christopher King So GHC 7.8.1 would be invalid for some of the challenges?
Apr 12, 2014 at 17:36 history answered Doorknob CC BY-SA 3.0