Timeline for answer to Sandbox for Proposed Challenges by Arcturus
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 16, 2016 at 15:22 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | @TimmyD I like ambiguity more than most people. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 15:15 | comment | added | AdmBorkBork | @MartinBüttner I read it as "This could probably use some more test cases, [such as] where the result is not the convex hull" ... yay, English. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 15:09 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | @TimmyD The emphasis in my sentence was on "more". ;) (I admit that may not have been obvious.) | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 15:08 | comment | added | AdmBorkBork |
@MartinBüttner The last test case is not the convex hull, as (10,0) and (10,10) are not included in the output polygon.
|
|
| Feb 16, 2016 at 7:45 | comment | added | Martin Ender Mod | This could probably use some more test cases where the result is not the convex hull... if possible even one where none of the points of the convex hull are part of the solution. | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 5:06 | comment | added | Arcturus | @David Thanks for catching that. I will fix it tomorrow, | |
| Feb 16, 2016 at 0:09 | comment | added | David | For the third test case, can't you get a four-side polygon (-5,5) -- (5,5) -- (1,0) -- (-1,0) -- (-5,5)? (or (0,-5) -- (-1,0) -- (0,1) -- (1,0) -- (0,-5)) | |
| Feb 15, 2016 at 23:32 | history | edited | Arcturus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 23:24 | history | edited | Arcturus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 15, 2016 at 23:06 | history | answered | Arcturus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |