Timeline for answer to Sandbox for Proposed Challenges by Sparr
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2016 at 22:11 | comment | added | Sparr | I'm thinking of restricting it to algorithms and output, not stuff like network and file access. | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 14:16 | comment | added | Blue | I don't know of any golfing languages where creating a simple webserver is possible. All this would be is finding a task that isn't normally required for when doing code-golf | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 7:27 | comment | added | Sparr | @DestructibleWatermelon you don't have to beat the golfing language to win. The winning entry will probably still have a shorter Jelly solution than Python (or whatever). | |
| Aug 24, 2016 at 7:26 | comment | added | Sparr | @feersum I'd probably disqualify errors and crashes and stacktrace outputs and such, and maybe all built-in non-trivial algorithms. Thanks for pointing those out. | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 6:31 | comment | added | feersum | It's very easy to come up with boring examples e.g. print this exact trace, reproduce the output of this random number generator, etc. I don't see any way to get interesting answers. | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 1:53 | comment | added | Dennis Mod | Related: Anti-golfscript anti-golf: create a task where GolfScript or J is outgolfed by your (conventional) lang closed | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 1:52 | comment | added | Destructible Lemon | The only language that could possibly win is mathematica | |
| Aug 23, 2016 at 1:40 | history | answered | Sparr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |