Timeline for answer to Fibonacci Exponents by Roman Czyborra

11 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jan 6, 2017 at 9:12	comment	added	Roman Czyborra		More precisely: 2 lists of numbers. Substituting `[a..b]` for `(a,b)` and postfix `?f` for prefix `o` seems as cognitively reasonable as substituting `a#b` or `o a b` for `o(a,b)` to me.
Jan 6, 2017 at 9:06	comment	added	Roman Czyborra		You mean: 2 lists of numbers. I thought `a#b` went too far.
Jan 6, 2017 at 1:13	comment	added	nimi		I think this goes too far. The input are two numbers (not necessarily as a pair, two separate arguments will do), but you're feeding a list of numbers and a function to your main function.
Jan 5, 2017 at 10:01	history	edited	Roman Czyborra	CC BY-SA 3.0	point-freed 7 bytes
Jan 5, 2017 at 9:52	comment	added	Roman Czyborra		Alrightie already, that brings us up to par with the ECMAscript7 lambda. But if we are allowed to feed `(a,b)` as `a?b` then why aren't we allowed to prepare it as immediate `[a..b]?f` onto `(?)=sum.zipWith(^)`?
Jan 5, 2017 at 9:40	history	edited	Roman Czyborra	CC BY-SA 3.0	uncounted trailing newline
Jan 4, 2017 at 20:29	comment	added	nimi		Many other answers take two separate arguments, so I think it's fine.
Jan 4, 2017 at 11:11	comment	added	Roman Czyborra		Had considered infix like a…b but read the requirement to accept unary (ℤ,ℤ)→ℕ
Jan 2, 2017 at 23:49	comment	added	nimi		You can turn the function `o` into an infix operator, like `a#b=sum...`.
Dec 31, 2016 at 20:36	review	Low quality posts
Dec 31, 2016 at 20:39
Dec 31, 2016 at 20:18	history	answered	Roman Czyborra	CC BY-SA 3.0