Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ Hope you haven't tested the drunk toddler part of the answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 26, 2016 at 23:30
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ +1. I don't see the challenge in using a tool to base64-encode the original; to me that seems like a lazy solution. This, I give points to! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 27, 2016 at 13:47
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Also, I made an autotracer unrelated to this challenge. The output is quite good for this picture, and afaik it is the smallest possible SVG without compromising quality. If any can minify this SVG any further, please ping me. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 28, 2016 at 18:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ It's only a three-byte savings, but isn't 1e4*2.9 equal to 29e3? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 1, 2016 at 5:21
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, every byte you save gets you closer to adding another primitive. Using it for optimization is a good point though. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 1, 2016 at 5:32