Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

10
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Surely it would be better to store the data using all 256 bytes instead of base 64, 85 or whatever. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 23, 2016 at 23:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ @feersum I don't know how to store binary data inside Python files in a better way than base encoding. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 23, 2016 at 23:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Score confirmed and validated - this is the winner for now. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 2:06
  • 15
    \$\begingroup\$ @Nathaniel You only asked this today so I suggest you don't mark this answer (or any answer) the accepted answer yet. When people see an answer has been accepted they may assume the contest is over and won't participate. I think it's best to wait at least a week or two before accepting any answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 24, 2016 at 7:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Yes, I can remove 1 from latin1 and save a whitespace from import *, at least. But golfing that wasn't a priority (since it is less than 1024 bytes). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 28, 2016 at 8:18