Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 22
    \$\begingroup\$ If you used a single letter instead of "context" and removed unnecessary whitespace you might have room to add additional detail to the image. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 29, 2016 at 14:04
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @RedwolfPrograms This isn't a code-golf challenge, answers don't have to golf their answers, so long as the code is less than 1024 bytes. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 20:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ChartZBelatedly But that still involves golfing, a lot of improvement would be possible by adding more rectangles, which requires saving more space. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 5, 2021 at 21:34
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ While this does not attempt golfing and could be clearly improved if that wasted space were replaced with more rectangles, I believe it is still a serious enough contender to stand as an answer. However, I would still recommend removing the unnecessary space and variable names to instead improve the image accuracy. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 14:09