Timeline for answer to Markov Chain Quine by ETHproductions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 19:57 | comment | added | Dom Hastings | I really enjoy the function/variable names in this too! Perl is just so much punctuation, but this and Ruby generate some great new words! | |
| S Nov 2, 2016 at 17:50 | history | suggested | Artyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated the JSFiddle
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 17:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 2, 2016 at 17:50 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2016 at 17:20 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 166 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:50 | comment | added | ETHproductions | @Artyer Apparently the function has around a 0.02% chance of generating valid JS: jsfiddle.net/hbzasbg8/2 | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:38 | comment | added | ETHproductions | @Artyer I didn't figure they were; that's why I didn't remove the full program. And that JSFiddle is awesome :) | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:36 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 15:31 | comment | added | Artyer | The second self-reading function isn't valid (meta.codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/4878/48878 "a quine must not access its own source, directly or indirectly."), and @DanTheMan, according to jsfiddle.net/kabkfLak/1, the chance should be around 6.3%. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 22:54 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 22:48 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 206 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 16:38 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 16:32 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 16:21 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 157 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | DanTheMan | @ETHproductions Duh. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 14:42 | comment | added | ETHproductions |
@DanTheMan uneval(a) on a string returns a wrapped in quotation marks. e.g. uneval("Hi!") -> "\"Hi!\""
|
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 14:39 | comment | added | DanTheMan |
Shouldn't uneval(a) and a+'' work the same?
|
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:46 | comment | added | ETHproductions | @ShaunH Thanks, I forgot that only FF supports uneval. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:45 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 66 characters in body
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:42 | comment | added | Shaun H | Might want to note this is FF only due to the use of uneval | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:23 | comment | added | ETHproductions |
@DanTheMan Certainly very, very low. Just the probability of all parentheses and brackets being balanced is incredibly low. Although one time I got a.splerength.r(), which could be valid ;)
|
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 13:21 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
golfed 2 bytes
|
| Nov 1, 2016 at 6:29 | comment | added | DanTheMan | I wonder what the probability of this generating valid JavaScript is. (Nerd snipe warning) | |
| Oct 31, 2016 at 21:40 | history | edited | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
make it a little less gibberish
|
| Oct 31, 2016 at 21:35 | history | answered | ETHproductions | CC BY-SA 3.0 |