Timeline for Bisection method
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2024 at 3:10 | comment | added | radarbob | *I don't consider it dead. * => This throws away decades of hard learned lessons on multi-millions of code lines. | |
| Nov 17, 2024 at 3:04 | comment | added | radarbob | But the // means exactly that. I am pretty sure it is clean but still submitting to code review. => It will fail code review in any IT shop that cares about quality and maintainability. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 10:11 | comment | added | paparazzo | @rob I think so. I don't consider it dead. I don't want to get in disagreement with you either. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 5:26 | comment | added | Rob | @Paparazzi You shouldn't avoid discussion on points - that's the whole reason the exchange site exists. After these few comments here, I'm still unsure which part of the feedback you're discussing since you ended the dialog so abruptly. Are you debating the point about removing dead code? | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 1:46 | comment | added | user34073 | I'm hope it helped, regardless of the +1. Have fun programming :) | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 1:45 | comment | added | paparazzo | Cool, I already gave a +1. Don't want to get into a disagreement. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 1:42 | history | edited | user34073 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 9, 2017 at 1:41 | comment | added | paparazzo | But the // means exactly that. I am pretty sure it is clean but still submitting to code review. If you don't agree cool. | |
| Jan 9, 2017 at 1:31 | history | answered | user34073 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |