Timeline for Bilinear image interpolation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2019 at 5:02 | comment | added | Cris Luengo | Are you using a least squares fit to do linear interpolation? Yes, that will be slow... Linear interpolation is a weighted addition of the four (in 2D) values. | |
| Aug 5, 2019 at 13:39 | vote | accept | Lin | ||
| S Aug 5, 2019 at 10:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Aug 5, 2019 at 10:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 29, 2019 at 23:16 | answer | added | AlexV | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 29, 2019 at 11:02 | comment | added | Toby Speight | You're expected to show actual code from your project - not an MCVE. Changing the structure so that we're reviewing something different is off-topic for Code Review. | |
| Jul 28, 2019 at 20:44 | comment | added | user11536834 | Out of curiosity, why is using opencv directly not a valid answer? Asking because when performance issues crop up in a language not primarily built for raw speed, seems like the usual thing to do would be delegate that stuff to a native library. Python isn't my go-to language, but if I were writing this for Lua(JIT), and found it to be unacceptably slow, I'd probably either whip something up in C or load up a suitable library (with the FFI, either way). | |
| S Jul 28, 2019 at 8:09 | history | bounty started | Lin | ||
| S Jul 28, 2019 at 8:09 | history | notice added | Lin | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jul 27, 2019 at 4:35 | history | edited | Lin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a non MCVE example, a large improvement, almost all for loops removed.
|
| Jul 27, 2019 at 4:28 | history | edited | Lin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a non MCVE example, a large improvement, almost all for loops removed.
|
| Jul 27, 2019 at 4:18 | history | edited | Lin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added a non MCVE example, a large improvement, almost all for loops removed.
|
| Jul 27, 2019 at 0:13 | comment | added | Lin | yes. Indeed a MCVE. I have changed all function calls to inlines inside the for-loop. | |
| Jul 26, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/1154859097633808386 | ||
| Jul 26, 2019 at 14:49 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 6 characters in body
|
| Jul 26, 2019 at 8:02 | comment | added | Toby Speight | Is this your real project code? I would have expected a function (perhaps with a sample "main" program to drive it with synthetic input). What we have here is more like the MCVE I'd expect on a Stack Overflow question. | |
| Jul 26, 2019 at 4:00 | history | asked | Lin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |