Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

15
  • 3
    Pretty sure that if rice had any significant amount of arsenic in it, it wouldn't be allowed to be sold. Reducing a quantity that's basically zero by 50% or 80% doesn't really make a difference, because it's still basically zero. Commented Aug 31, 2021 at 6:59
  • 1
    there was a recent study done by a University in Ireland and reported in Yahoo News on this subject and actually, it is quite worrying. If you eat rice often, that is. But in any case, it is a very good reason to not recycle the soaking water. Commented Aug 31, 2021 at 7:07
  • 1
    "In April 2016, the FDA proposed an action level, or limit, of 100 parts per billion (ppb) for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal." Like I said, basically zero. Unless you're eating multiple kilograms of rice, it's not a big deal. Commented Aug 31, 2021 at 7:16
  • 3
    @nick012000 so 125g rice with 100ppb, would be equal to 10% of your 50 μg/L per day. Commented Aug 31, 2021 at 9:03
  • 2
    Welcome to SA, Brad! However, I'm afraid that I've -1'd your answer, because you are offering specific food safety advice without linking to a reputable source of this advice. If you can fix your answer to link to advice from recognized food authorities, I (and others) will likely upvote it. Thanks! Commented Aug 31, 2021 at 18:22